Re: UFS spørgsmå

From: Munish Chopra (none@mchopra--engmail.uwaterloo.ca.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Thu 12 Sep 2002 - 21:36:34 CEST

Next message: Munish Chopra: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Previous message: Munish Chopra: "Re: Lyd i FreeBSD generelt"
In reply to: Morten Liebach: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Next in thread: Munish Chopra: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:36:34 -0400
From: Munish Chopra <none@mchopra--engmail.uwaterloo.ca.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: UFS spørgsmå

On 2002-09-12 13:26 +0000, Morten Liebach wrote:
>
> Da jeg brugte Linux var ext2 det eneste filsystem der var, det var
> noet hø for at sige det pænt. Jeg tror ext3 er bedre, men jeg ved det
> ikke.
>

Ext2 + journaling. Ikke ligefrem den mest elegante arkitektur, men ext3
er 'backwards compatible' med ext2, hvilket af mange ses som et stort
plus.

-- 
Munish Chopra

Next message: Munish Chopra: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Previous message: Munish Chopra: "Re: Lyd i FreeBSD generelt"
In reply to: Morten Liebach: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Next in thread: Munish Chopra: "Re: UFS spørgsmå"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:22 CET