Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!

From: Phil Regnauld (none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Wed 26 Oct 2005 - 16:23:17 CEST

Next message: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Previous message: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
In reply to: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Next in thread: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Reply: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:23:17 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:42:53PM +0200, Sven Esbjerg wrote:
> Personligt har jeg den holdning at det gælder om at afvise mails så tidligt
> som muligt.

Det skal man. relay_recipient_maps is your friend.

> Mest af alt kan jeg anbefale at sætte postfix til at kontrollere at man kan
> svare på en mail (domæne opslag + check for modtagelse på afsenderadressen).

Det virker ikke med store installationer.

Next message: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Previous message: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
In reply to: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Next in thread: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Reply: Joachim Bondo: "Re: mailq-output = 2.5MB!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:53 CET