Re: NOPROFILE vs. NO_PROFILE options [was: portinstall/upgrade]

From: Benny Simonsen (none@bsd-dk--slbs.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Sat 19 Nov 2005 - 16:07:59 CET


Subject: Re: NOPROFILE vs. NO_PROFILE options [was: portinstall/upgrade]
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
From: Benny Simonsen <none@bsd-dk--slbs.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
Date: 19 Nov 2005 16:07:59 +0100


"Simon L. Nielsen" <none@simon--FreeBSD.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
wrote on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:04:20 +0100:

> On 2005.11.19 15:51:31 +0100, Benny Simonsen wrote:
>
> > Nu har jeg et aktuel problem.... eller maaske er det alligevel noget
> > andet jeg har problemer med nu:
> > Nemlig NOPROFILE / NO_PROGILE
> >
> > Help soeges!
> >
> > Sysinfo: FreeBSD 6.0 cvsupd' til tag=RELENG_6 for src, alt andet til tag=. idag.
> > Log fra install af apache2:
> >
> > # portupgrade -NPR www/apache2
> > "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk", line 36: warning: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE
>
> Det betyder rimeligt pręcist det den siger... i 6.0+ skal du bruge
> NO_PROFILE istedet for NOPROFILE i make.conf mv. Det skyldes at en
> masse options er renamet fra NOFOO til NO_FOO så alle den type options
> skulle konsistent starte med NO_.
>
> Fra UPDATING:
>
> 20041221:
> By a popular demand, a lot of NOFOO options were renamed
> to NO_FOO (see bsd.compat.mk for a full list). The old
> spellings are still supported, but will cause annoying
> warnings on stderr. Make sure you upgrade properly (see
> the COMMON ITEMS: section later in this file).
>
> --
> Simon L. Nielsen

Hej

Tak for hjaelpen.

Havde lige overset at jeg havde faaet smidt NOPROFILE i min
/etc/make.conf

Slag slag ...

/Benny



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:54 CET