Re: NOPROFILE vs. NO_PROFILE options [was: portinstall/upgrade]

From: Simon L. Nielsen (none@simon--FreeBSD.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Sat 19 Nov 2005 - 16:04:20 CET


Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:04:20 +0100
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <none@simon--FreeBSD.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: NOPROFILE vs. NO_PROFILE options [was: portinstall/upgrade]


On 2005.11.19 15:51:31 +0100, Benny Simonsen wrote:

> Nu har jeg et aktuel problem.... eller maaske er det alligevel noget
> andet jeg har problemer med nu:
> Nemlig NOPROFILE / NO_PROGILE
>
> Help soeges!
>
> Sysinfo: FreeBSD 6.0 cvsupd' til tag=RELENG_6 for src, alt andet til tag=. idag.
> Log fra install af apache2:
>
> # portupgrade -NPR www/apache2
> "/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk", line 36: warning: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE

Det betyder rimeligt pręcist det den siger... i 6.0+ skal du bruge
NO_PROFILE istedet for NOPROFILE i make.conf mv. Det skyldes at en
masse options er renamet fra NOFOO til NO_FOO så alle den type options
skulle konsistent starte med NO_.

Fra UPDATING:

20041221:
        By a popular demand, a lot of NOFOO options were renamed
        to NO_FOO (see bsd.compat.mk for a full list). The old
        spellings are still supported, but will cause annoying
        warnings on stderr. Make sure you upgrade properly (see
        the COMMON ITEMS: section later in this file).

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen




This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:54 CET