Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark

From: Magnus Bodin (none@magnus--bodin.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Mon 20 Oct 2003 - 14:56:44 CEST

Next message: Anders Dyekjær Hansen: "RE: sandberg ATA controller"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "sandberg ATA controller"
In reply to: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Next in thread: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:56:44 +0200
From: Magnus Bodin <none@magnus--bodin.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark

On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 02:05:33PM +0200, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
> Quoting Phil Regnauld (regnauld@starBSD.org):
>
> > ... og hvorfor der ikke var 4.8/4.9-RC med (da han tester
> > alligevel 2.4/2.6). Jeg undrer mig også over OpenBSD's perf...
>
> Et bud kunne vaere at OpenBSD ikke fokuserer paa at optimere hastighed
> men fokuserer paa korrekt kode. Et andet bud kunne vaere deres W^X

NETOP. Jeg har OpenBSD på min laptop, server og firewall lige derfor att jeg er
paranoid. Ikke derfor att jeg har det travlt.

/magnus

-- 
http://x42.com

Next message: Anders Dyekjær Hansen: "RE: sandberg ATA controller"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "sandberg ATA controller"
In reply to: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Next in thread: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:32 CET