Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:09:16 -0800 (PST) From: valentin <none@ervin_valentin--yahoo.com.lh.bsd-dk.dk> Subject: Re: Nogle der har prøvet NetBSD? To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
se her
http://feyrer.de/NetBSD/gmcgarry/
eller her
Basically:
1) use NetBSD if you have exotic hardware and want a BSD Unix
2) use Linux if you have exotic hardware and want Linux
3) use FreeBSD if you can spec your X86 hardware, you run fairly
standard apps (web server, email, etc..) and reliability/scaling is your
number one goal -- FreeBSD has nowhere near the hardware support of
Linux
4) use OpenBSD if you must have absolutely the best security: but
prepare to be using old versions of everything
5) use Linux if you need something -- e.g. Oracle 8i/9i -- which is
unavailable on the other platforms
Basically what it means is, for most tasks I find Linux to be the best
fit. Sure, it doesn't have "years behind it" -- but FreeBSD for example
is not demonstrably faster; NetBSD is basically a curiosity, besides,
you can run Linux on everything from iPAQ to mainframe, which you CANNOT
say for NetBSD; and OpenBSD is for Theo and his zealots.
For desktop, the killer factor is drivers. And Linux leaves all the
eller her
Kører selv Freebsd som 7 ports router/firewall (m0n0), NAS (FreeNAS) og på en gl. tPad ... kører flot & med en superb pakke behandling.
Har prøvet NetBSD men valget faldt på FreeBSD pga den nemmere tilgængelighed ... men behovet må afgøre valget.
Suse Linux & VmWare (test selv freebsd, netbsd, openbsd eller andet heri) på min favorit desktop.
www.valentin-jensen.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 31 Jan 2007 - 23:00:05 CET