Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing

From: Phil Regnauld (none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Fri 09 Feb 2007 - 11:19:23 CET

Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Previous message: Henrik Kramshøj: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
In reply to: Henrik Kramshøj: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Next in thread: Claus Guttesen: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:19:23 +0100
From: Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing

Henrik Kramshøj (hlk) writes:
>
>
> PF er efter min mening så overskuelig at det er mit foretrukne valg
> fremfor eksempelvis en PIX.

        PIX kan mange andre ting, men ja, PF er mere overskuelig på mange
        punkter. Question of taste. IPFW er f.eks. langt mere avanceret
        på IP option processing, user restriktioner end PF, og dens parser
        er bedre til at sige hvor fejlen er (pf siger "syntax error", ikke
        andet), men PF har jo pfsync. Pick and choose.

Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Previous message: Henrik Kramshøj: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
In reply to: Henrik Kramshøj: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Next in thread: Claus Guttesen: "Re: FreeBSD 6.2 Cluster / Load balancing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 28 Feb 2007 - 23:00:02 CET