Re: Spam relay

From: Peter N. M. Hansteen (peter@bgnett.no)
Date: Wed 13 Sep 2006 - 22:25:23 CEST

Next message: Lasse Hillerře Petersen: "Reverse DNS - nu vi alligevel taler om spam"
Previous message: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
Next in thread: Lennart Sorth: "Re: Spam relay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Spam relay
From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:25:23 +0200

Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk> writes:

> Drop backup MX,

fristende, men hver backup-mx med fornuftig oppsett kaster jo bort et
inkrement mer tid for spammere enn den ene ville gjort.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
20:11:56 delilah spamd[26905]: 146.151.48.74: disconnected after 36099 seconds

Next message: Lasse Hillerře Petersen: "Reverse DNS - nu vi alligevel taler om spam"
Previous message: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
Next in thread: Lennart Sorth: "Re: Spam relay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:25:04 CET