*BSD artikel

From: Phil Regnauld (none@regnauld--starbsd.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Fri 28 Dec 2001 - 10:02:42 CET

Next message: Dennis Pedersen: "Probs med FreeBSD 4,4 & Racoon"
Previous message: Søren Elleby Sørensen: "Denne aften =)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:02:42 +0100
From: Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--starbsd.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: BSD DK Mailing List <none@bsd-dk--bsd-dk.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
Subject: *BSD artikel

http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,2000024997,20262355,00.htm

  I hear a lot of discussion about how superior Linux
  is to Microsoft*s operating systems. Certainly,
  there are many more attacks targeting Windows and
  IIS platforms.

  A good case can also be made that Linux is
  inherently more stable and secure than Microsoft
  products, either because it*s based on a better core
  of code or because it*s open source, and many
  individuals have a stake in monitoring and making
  repairs.

  However, with all this discussion, there rarely
  seems to be any mention of an even more secure and
  completely free version of UNIX: BSD. While Linux is
  the darling of the hacker set, it is far from the
  least expensive or even the most secure open source
  operating system available. Linux isn*t even running
  on the widest range of systems. All three of those
  distinctions belong to an academically developed
  version of UNIX that originated at the University of
  California, Berkeley and whose various versions are
  often referred to collectively as BSD (Berkeley
  Software Distribution).

  Linux vs. BSD

[...]

Next message: Dennis Pedersen: "Probs med FreeBSD 4,4 & Racoon"
Previous message: Søren Elleby Sørensen: "Denne aften =)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:17 CET