Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance

From: Phil Regnauld (none@regnauld--BSD-Dk.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Thu 15 Jun 2000 - 00:45:09 CEST

Next message: Kenneth Karlsson: "Har i set denne ?!"
Previous message: Lars Bo Molnit: "RE: Sv: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
In reply to: Svenne Krap: "Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
Next in thread: Jacob Bohn Lorensen: "Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:45:09 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--BSD-Dk.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance

On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Svenne Krap wrote:
> Ups glemte i forbifarten...vores funkede også fint, indtil den ramte
> FreeBSD vs. W2K tingen.... :)
>
> So the answer is still "skod kort" :)

Hvad med bare at lave (or gemme) en tcpdump af begge
type sessions, og analysere ?

i.e.:

FTP fra Win2k til FreeBSD
FTP fra Win98 til FreeBSD

Samme fil.

Og så kig i det met Ethereal.

Next message: Kenneth Karlsson: "Har i set denne ?!"
Previous message: Lars Bo Molnit: "RE: Sv: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
In reply to: Svenne Krap: "Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
Next in thread: Jacob Bohn Lorensen: "Re: Win2k vs. FreeBSD og netværksperformance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:02 CET