Re: Postfix... reject RCPT...

From: Uffe R. B. Andersen (none@urb--twe.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Wed 15 Sep 2010 - 00:10:34 CEST


Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:10:34 +0200
From: "Uffe R. B. Andersen" <none@urb--twe.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Postfix... reject RCPT...


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Den 14-09-2010 23:41, Michael Rasmussen skrev:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 23:18:53 +0200
> "Uffe R. B. Andersen" <none@urb--twe.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk> wrote:
>
>
>> De fleste kilder på nettet synes at hælde til, at man skal holde sig væk
>> fra "smtpd_sender_restrictions" og kun anvende
>> "smtpd_recipient_restrictions".
>
> Uden at jeg på nogen både vil kalde mig autoritativ, mener jeg, en
> udmærket indstilling for smtpd_sender_restrictions kan være:
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> # Only if sasl authentication is activated
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> # My own networks not using authentication
> permit_mynetworks,
> # My own private RBL
> check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/blacklist_clients_regexp,
> # This is obvious
> reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
>

Hvordan skulle den opsætning tillade en anden mailserver at aflevere en
mail?

- --
Med venlig hilsen - Sincerely
Uffe R. B. Andersen - mailto:urb@twe.net
http://blog.andersen.nu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkyP8toACgkQxC95nUQcrpgvIwCg9WKeq8Q+0i+0d1mbmxQox48X
9vIAn0njtbAEXeFN+izI4wwFEtGzODCi
=JjjR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu 30 Sep 2010 - 23:00:00 CEST