Re: Spam relay

From: Peter N. M. Hansteen (peter@bgnett.no)
Date: Wed 13 Sep 2006 - 21:30:20 CEST

Next message: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Previous message: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
In reply to: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Next in thread: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Reply: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Reply: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Spam relay
From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:30:20 +0200

"Uffe R. B. Andersen" <none@urb--twe.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk> writes:

> Spammerne håber åbenbart på, at min backup MX er mindre restriktiv
> end min primære og at min primære er mere tolerant overfor mails fra
> min backup

helt som det jeg ser. men grålistende spamd foran både primær og
sekundær mx gjør underverker :)

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
20:11:56 delilah spamd[26905]: 146.151.48.74: disconnected after 36099 seconds

Next message: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Previous message: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
In reply to: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Next in thread: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Reply: Uffe R. B. Andersen: "Re: Spam relay"
Reply: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Spam relay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:25:04 CET