Re: logo contest

From: Morten Juhl Johansen (none@oldblueyes--gmail.com.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Mon 06 Feb 2006 - 09:45:48 CET

Next message: Albers, Tony: "RE: logo contest"
Previous message: Jok: "Re: logo contest"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: logo contest"
Next in thread: Lennart Sorth: "Re: logo contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:45:48 +0100
From: Morten Juhl Johansen <none@oldblueyes--gmail.com.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: logo contest

/me er enig i prioriteringsrækkefølgen.

-MJJ

Den 06-02-06 skrev Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--x0.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:21:27AM +0100, Jesper Laursen wrote:
> >
> > Jeg er mest til Logo 2.
> > Logo 6 er nu meget sjov, men måske lidt for stort.
>
> Jeg foretrækker 6,2,1 -- og 6'eren kan nok skaleres ned :)
>
> 6, 2 og 1 har det fordele at:
>
> - de fungerer med få farver (det gør de stort set allesammen)
> - de fungerer godt i mindre størrelser (vigtigt)
>
>

--
weblog > http://weblog.leetness.dk

Next message: Albers, Tony: "RE: logo contest"
Previous message: Jok: "Re: logo contest"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: logo contest"
Next in thread: Lennart Sorth: "Re: logo contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:57 CET