Re: sshd i Jail

From: Michael Knudsen (none@e--molioner.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Wed 10 Nov 2004 - 13:35:15 CET

Next message: Simon Østengaard: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Previous message: Laust S. Jespersen: "Re: sshd i Jail"
In reply to: Laust S. Jespersen: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Next in thread: Simon Østengaard: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:35:15 +0100
From: Michael Knudsen <none@e--molioner.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: sshd i Jail

Quoting Laust S. Jespersen (L@ust.dk):
> Hvad med scponly evt?

De kan jo stadig forsoege at gaette filnavne.

Jeg forstaar nu ikke helt oensket om at holde brugere i deres
hjemmebibliotek. Man kan jo bare saette permissions korrekt
(o-rwx).

-- 
<soaplove> reverse: yah, totallu.
<soaplove> Looks like some of my y fell off in transit. TCP sucks.

Next message: Simon Østengaard: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Previous message: Laust S. Jespersen: "Re: sshd i Jail"
In reply to: Laust S. Jespersen: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Next in thread: Simon Østengaard: "Re: sshd i Jail"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:46 CET