Re: Store HD'ere ?

From: Jimmy Selgen (none@jsn--devlix.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Sun 14 Mar 2004 - 15:34:09 CET

Next message: Hroi Sigurdsson: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Previous message: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
In reply to: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Next in thread: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Subject: Re: Store HD'ere ?
From: Jimmy Selgen <none@jsn--devlix.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:34:09 +0100

On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 11:49, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Fordelen ved at lave en lille root-partition, er at
> den i tilfælde af et crash, vil være mest tilbøjelig
> til at måtte få en fsck-behandling (pga. af fraværet
> af softupdate). Og jo mindre den er, jo hurtigere vil
> systemet kunne komme op igen.
Uhmm .. hvem siger man ikke kan køre soft-updates på sin / partition ?

[KLIPPEKLISTRELIMIHÅRET]
/dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
/dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad0s1g on /usr/home (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates)
/dev/ad0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates)
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)

Snyder den mig bare når den siger at soft-updates er enablet på min /
partition ?

Kører p.t. 5.2.1, men har da virket siden 5.0 ( kan ikke lige huske med
4.x, er jo ved at være nogle år siden )

/Jimmy

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Next message: Hroi Sigurdsson: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Previous message: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
In reply to: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Next in thread: Jesper Louis Andersen: "Re: Store HD'ere ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:38 CET