Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release

From: Sven Esbjerg (none@esbjerg--xbsd.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Tue 13 Jan 2004 - 09:19:37 CET

Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
In reply to: Jakob Kruse: "Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Next in thread: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:19:37 +0100
From: Sven Esbjerg <none@esbjerg--xbsd.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:40:23AM +0100, Jakob Kruse wrote:
> Mit spørgsmål går ud på, er en 5.2 stabil nok som produktions server ?
> Skal jeg hellere installere en 5.1-current ? ( hvis muligt )

Som det er nævnt i anden post så er 5.2 nok et bedre valg end 5.1.

mvh
Sven

-- 
http://www.usenet.dk/netikette - på forhånd tak.

Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
In reply to: Jakob Kruse: "Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Next in thread: Claus Guttesen: "Re: Freebsd 4.9-stable - Freebsd 5.1-current - Freebsd 5.2-release"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:35 CET