RE: IPFW traffic shaping

From: Tommy Eriksen (none@tommy--the-coffeeshop.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Sun 22 Aug 2004 - 22:14:09 CEST

Next message: Martin Madsen: "SV: SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
Previous message: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
In reply to: Martin Madsen: "SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
Next in thread: Andreas Ryge: "Re: IPFW traffic shaping"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Tommy Eriksen" <none@tommy--the-coffeeshop.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: <none@bsd-dk--bsd-dk.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
Subject: RE: IPFW traffic shaping
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:14:09 +0200

> Jeg må lige kigge på det.
>
> Jeg tror måske det er fordi når jeg kontakter en
> webserver/side på port 80
> sender den vel svar tilbage på en anden port som er ukendt...
> eller er jeg
> forkert på den?

Du har helt ret. Hvis du skifter fx
# Tildel web trafik (browsing og download) til medium prioriteret traffik
add 104 queue 2 tcp from any to 192.168.1.0/24 80,8080,9090 in via vr0

Ud med
# Tildel web trafik (browsing og download) til medium prioriteret traffik
add 104 queue 2 tcp from any 80,8080,9090 to 192.168.1.0/24 in via vr0

Next message: Martin Madsen: "SV: SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
Previous message: Simon L. Nielsen: "Re: SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
In reply to: Martin Madsen: "SV: IPFW traffic shaping"
Next in thread: Andreas Ryge: "Re: IPFW traffic shaping"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:42 CET