Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark

From: Mark Rosenstand (none@mark--geekworld.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Sun 19 Oct 2003 - 17:26:58 CEST

Next message: Martin Madsen: "port_redirect problem."
Previous message: Thomas Willert: "Re: OpenBSD: CVS via http proxy"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:26:58 +0200
From: Mark Rosenstand <none@mark--geekworld.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark

Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--starBSD.org.lh.bsd-dk.dk> wrote:

> ... og hvorfor der ikke var 4.8/4.9-RC med (da han tester
> alligevel 2.4/2.6).

Ja, det virker underligt at han ikke også tog sig tid til også at
benchmarke en -STABLE, da han både testede Linux 2.4 og 2.6. Jeg synes
dog sagtens at FreeBSD-udviklerne kan være stolte over resultaterne med
-CURRENT :-)

Next message: Martin Madsen: "port_redirect problem."
Previous message: Thomas Willert: "Re: OpenBSD: CVS via http proxy"
In reply to: Phil Regnauld: "Re: Linux vs. BSD benchmark"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:32 CET