Re: OS X

From: Jesper Skriver (none@jesper--skriver.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Fri 24 May 2002 - 10:13:13 CEST

Next message: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: OS X"
Previous message: ts@interactive.as: "C/C++ IDE"
In reply to: Claus Guttesen: "Re: OS X"
Next in thread: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: OS X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 10:13:13 +0200
From: Jesper Skriver <none@jesper--skriver.dk.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: OS X

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:49:41AM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Hej igen.
>
> >
> > 10.0 var laaannngsom, 10.1 nooooggggett hurtigere,
> > mens 10.2/5 efter sigende skulle være ret
> > huuuurrrtig.
> >
>
> Og så skal 10.2/5 have samme kodebase som FreeBSD 4.4,
> samt benytte gcc 3.1 kompilatoren. Den nye kompilator
> i sig selv vil øge hastigheden på OS X med 10-15 %,
> hvis det er samme OS X version.
>
> Ved nogen hvornår gcc 3.1 kommer i STABLE-grenen?

FreeBSD -stable ? Det gør den ikke så længe at det er FreeBSD
4.x som er stable

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456
Work:    Network manager   @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.

Next message: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: OS X"
Previous message: ts@interactive.as: "C/C++ IDE"
In reply to: Claus Guttesen: "Re: OS X"
Next in thread: Sven Esbjerg: "Re: OS X"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:20 CET