Re: www.bigbrother.dk

From: Phil Regnauld (none@regnauld--ftf.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk)
Date: Wed 31 Jan 2001 - 13:50:45 CET

Next message: Phil Regnauld: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Previous message: Anders Dinsen: "Re: Updating af ports"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "www.bigbrother.dk"
Next in thread: Sonny T. Larsen: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Reply: Sonny T. Larsen: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:50:45 +0100
From: Phil Regnauld <none@regnauld--ftf.net.lh.bsd-dk.dk>
To: bsd-dk@bsd-dk.dk
Subject: Re: www.bigbrother.dk

Poul-Henning Kamp (phk) writes:
>
> Gik, som forventet ned.
>
> Se hvad netcraft siger:
>
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.bigbrother.dk

Hmmm...

Bad tuning ?

Typically, people tune / forget to tune Apache in a stupid way,
with bloated features like mod_perl, etc...

i.e.: 500 processes is way too much for most systems, especially
if you don't (like most people) put rlimits on the proc. resources...

Also, MaxRequestsPerChild helps...

Anyway -- what are you telling us here ? That a good OS badly tuned will
be in deep shit when the elephants come a'runnin' ? :)

Next message: Phil Regnauld: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Previous message: Anders Dinsen: "Re: Updating af ports"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "www.bigbrother.dk"
Next in thread: Sonny T. Larsen: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Reply: Sonny T. Larsen: "Re: www.bigbrother.dk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed 15 Nov 2006 - 18:24:04 CET